[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] Re: ynai
Jordan DeLong wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:39:16PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
What about {mi viska le bloti .ui .y. nai}?
The way the bnf is defined that would not parse, unfortunately.
And this actually contradicts slightly the CLL (p484): "it can appear
anywhere at all in a
lojban sentence except in the middle of a word"
The rules for that stuff are informal though; they shouldn't be
taken too literally. "Y" really ought to be dealt with at the same
level as si/sa/su, as someone mentioned.
Indeed. Anf then it should be removed entirely from the formal grammar
and handle through
a new 'Filtering Step'. (probably something for the BPFK)
But note that it should be filtered *before* SI/SA/SU stuff: there is
no need to erase a harmless
Y, whereas I may *very much* hesitate before uttering an erasing SA :-)
(BTW, here is food for another thread: this nasty SA is still to be
formalized AFAIK, and this
is not an easy job :-)
Best wishes,
Lionel Vidal