[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: ynai



Jordan DeLong wrote:

On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 06:39:16PM -0400, Pierre Abbat wrote:
What about {mi viska le bloti .ui .y. nai}?

The way the bnf is defined that would not parse, unfortunately.

And this actually contradicts slightly the CLL (p484): "it can appear anywhere at all in a
lojban sentence except in the middle of a word"

The rules for that stuff are informal though; they shouldn't be
taken too literally.  "Y" really ought to be dealt with at the same
level as si/sa/su, as someone mentioned.

Indeed. Anf then it should be removed entirely from the formal grammar and handle through
a new 'Filtering Step'. (probably something for the  BPFK)
But note that it should be filtered *before* SI/SA/SU stuff: there is no need to erase a harmless
Y, whereas I may *very much* hesitate before uttering an erasing SA :-)
(BTW, here is food for another thread: this nasty SA is still to be formalized AFAIK, and this
is not an easy job :-)

Best wishes,
Lionel Vidal