[lojban] Re: Text for beginners - chrestomathy part 1

["Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>]

>> Basically, the Chrestomathy is not, to my knowledge, given any
>> officialstatus, so it has no relationship whatsoever with the BF.

>Insert rant about how it's not surprising that we have so many
>unbelievably stupid official projects when members of LLG don't bother
>reading the list of official projects which are up for consideration.

Actually, what I meant was that it wasn't official in the sense of being a
baselined document. If there had been an error in the Zelda translation and
we had voted it up, I would not assume that the error was okay in the
absence of BF prescription to the contrary. I was thinking "official" in
terms of being an official part of the baselined language, rather than in
terms of being recognized by LLG. I'm sorry for the confusion.

>It was about number 20 on the list when we voted and it's rather
>prominent on:

>http://www.lojban.org/llg/projects.html

You may recall how many things were up for voting. I do not remember all of
them, nor do I expect anyone else to. I do remember the Chrestomathy,
however.

 -- .kreig.daniyl.

"Best case scenario: free ice cream for all. Worst case scenario: World War
3-27"
 -carbon

ragnarok@pobox.com
teucer@bnomic.org