At 01:22 PM 10/16/03 -0700, Robin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 02:50:54PM -0400, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > At 04:39 PM 10/15/03 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > The "intent" (however sloppy) was >> le cecmu cu gunma mi joi da (unless I am the only component of the mass).> > but I believe current thinking would make it > > le cecmu cu gunma mi ce da My question was, can argument 2 be incompletely specified?
I thought I indicated not - that se pagbu would work for incompletely specified component lists, so we don't need gunma to be exactly the same thing.
lojbab -- lojbab lojbab@lojban.org Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group (Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.) Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org