Re: [lojban] Re: fu'ivla rafsi and r-hyphens

[Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>]

On Monday 01 December 2003 17:48, Jorge "Llambías" wrote:
> > In my proposal, a rafsi that immediately precedes a fu'ivla rafsi must
> > end in
> >
> > a consonant, so if you want to use a cmavo with no CVC rafsi, you have to
> > use {zei}. I hadn't thought of {ba'oryglauka}; if it works, and all cmavo
> > that have rafsi have a CVV or CVC rafsi, it would be a way to make lujvo
> > with them. (I'll check later. I have an errand to run.)
>
> "dza" and "jve" appear to be the only CCV rafsi for cmavo, and both
> have other forms, namely "dav" and "jev".
>
> We need an additional rule: when a rafsi fu'ivla is preceded by a CVV
> rafsi, this rafsi will sometimes have to be y-separated from its
> preceding rafsi, if any. For example: {bardyba'oryglauka} for the
> lujvo formed from {barda-banro-glauka}. {braba'oryglauka} is a lujvo
> formed from two fu'ivla {braba'orV} and {glauka}, not from {braba'o}
> and {glauka}.
>
> The "sometimes" needs to be worked out in more detail.

As my proposal currently stands, {ba'oryglauka} is not a word; the rafsi 
before a fu'iva rafsi must end with a consonant, and that's how I'll write 
the program. Once we have working code handling both proposals, then we can 
try new rules out.

phma
-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.