[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

OT: Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?

To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>, "Pierre Abbat" <phma@webjockey.net>
Subject: OT: Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@v21.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:54:56 -0000
References: <20040209194328.GI1600@digitalkingdom.org> <200402091751.21409.phma@webjockey.net>

From: "Pierre Abbat" <phma@webjockey.net>
> I just got paid for a darg

What, people (in the USA, no less) still use the word 'darg'?
Or is it one of those archaic words like deasil and widdershins 
that Hackers have revived?

--And.

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban] Re: OT: Re: Status of morphology commission?
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
- Re: OT: Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Re: OT: Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>

References:
- [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Re: Status of morphology commission?
Next by Date: [lojban] Re: Status of morphology commission?
Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: Status of morphology commission?
Next by thread: [lojban] Re: OT: Re: Status of morphology commission?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread