[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OT: Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?

To: And Rosta <a.rosta@v21.me.uk>
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 20:59:29 -0500
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <00f101c3ef70$95a80ce0$6f3a0751@oemcomputer>
References: <20040209194328.GI1600@digitalkingdom.org> <200402091751.21409.phma@webjockey.net> <00f101c3ef70$95a80ce0$6f3a0751@oemcomputer>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

And Rosta scripsit:

> From: "Pierre Abbat" <phma@webjockey.net>
> > I just got paid for a darg
> 
> What, people (in the USA, no less) still use the word 'darg'?
> Or is it one of those archaic words like deasil and widdershins 
> that Hackers have revived?

I had never heard "darg" before today, but Canadians do preserve
some archaisms that Usonians don't, and vice versa.

-- 
A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me: jcowan@reutershealth.com]
Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
    "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
    If it only had metre                http://www.reutershealth.com
And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked line!] --Michael Kay

References:
- [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
- OT: Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@v21.me.uk>

Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: OT: Re: Status of morphology commission?
Next by Date: Re: OT: Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: OT: Re: Status of morphology commission?
Next by thread: Re: OT: Re: [lojban] Status of morphology commission?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread