[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] fi'u was Re:lanzu usage

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] fi'u was Re:lanzu usage
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 12:31:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <200403251219.00947.phma@webjockey.net>
Organization: dis
References: <200403250931.i2P9VLb16669@xahlee.org> <20040325163110.GC25199@skunk.reutershealth.com> <200403251219.00947.phma@webjockey.net>
User-agent: KMail/1.5

On Thursday 25 March 2004 12:19, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> The prenex needs to be refermatted. It looks like one long number-letter
> string, and without a member of KOhA it's ungrammatical, at least according
> to jbofi'e.

This appears to be the correct fermat:

roboi xyboi roboi .ybuboi roboi zyboi noboi ny zo'u
li xy. te'a ny. su'i .ybu te'a ny. du li zy. te'a ny
.ije li ny. zmadu li re

Boi, that's a lot!

phma
-- 
li fi'u vu'u fi'u fi'u du li pa

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban] Re: fi'u was Re:lanzu usage
  - From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>

References:
- Re:lanzu usage
  - From: "xahlee.org" <yahoo@xahlee.org>
- Re: [lojban] fi'u was Re:lanzu usage
  - From: jcowan@reutershealth.com
- Re: [lojban] fi'u was Re:lanzu usage
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] fi'u was Re:lanzu usage
Next by Date: [lojban] Re: reply to a negated selbri (compared to French)
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] fi'u was Re:lanzu usage
Next by thread: [lojban] Re: fi'u was Re:lanzu usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread