[lojban] (arguable) jbofi'e bug: mi ca'o tai klaku

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

jbofihe does not accept

    mi ca'o tai klaku

It turns out that whether one accepts this as a jbofihe bug or not
depends on what one thinks of treading "mo'ini'a mo'ini'a" as 
"mo'ini'a ku mo'ini'a ku", because this is exactly the same situation:
the other two parsers see the example above as "mi ca'o ku tai klaku".

I see nothing in any of the grammars that in any way indicates that that
interpretation is in error, so unless and until someone shows that the
"adding ku to sumtcita when doing so is the only way to get a successful
parse" interpretation of KU as an elidable terminator is wrong, I'm
taking that behaviour as being the current, grammar.300 baselined
standard.

Hence, not doing so is a bug in jbofihe.

-Robin

-- 
Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***   I'm a *male* Robin.
"Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all
from running out and eating all the cookies."  -- Eliezer Yudkowsky
http://www.lojban.org/             ***              .i cimo'o prali .ui