[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: fragment + i-jek

--- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 01:23:16AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> > Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
> > > I'm assuming the official parser is wrong; fragments cannot be
> > > joined by ijeks, but wanted to check.
> > 
> > It's wrong, or rather obsolete.  We used not to distinguish between i
> > and ijek, grammatically, and the fixes to the official parser were
> > lost.
> 
> OK.  Slightly wierder one:
> 
> lenu broda kei cu zemucu'o i ja lenu brode
> 
> That seems to be wrong, but why?  It's fine without the 'ja'.

Same thing, isn't it? {le nu brode} is a fragment. 

mu'o mi'e xorxes



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail