[lojban] Re: fragment + i-jek

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 05:29:24PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 01:23:16AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> > > Robin Lee Powell scripsit:
> > > > I'm assuming the official parser is wrong; fragments cannot be
> > > > joined by ijeks, but wanted to check.
> > > 
> > > It's wrong, or rather obsolete.  We used not to distinguish
> > > between i and ijek, grammatically, and the fixes to the official
> > > parser were lost.
> > 
> > OK.  Slightly wierder one:
> > 
> > lenu broda kei cu zemucu'o i ja lenu brode
> > 
> > That seems to be wrong, but why?  It's fine without the 'ja'.
> 
> Same thing, isn't it? {le nu brode} is a fragment. 

I suppose, but {lenu broda kei cu zemucu'o} sure isn't.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/  ***  I'm a *male* Robin.
"Many philosophical problems are caused by such things as the simple
inability to shut up." -- David Stove, liberally paraphrased.
http://www.lojban.org/  ***  loi pimlu na srana .i ti rokci morsi