[lojban] Re: jordis

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

--- jordi mas wrote:
> > (2)
> > xu do me le fanva be abu
> > "Are you among those I describe as the translators
> > of A?" 
> > 
> > (3)
> > xu do du le fanva be abu
> > "Are you the one(s) I describe as the translator(s)
> > of A?"
>
> So the difference between (2) and (3) is that 
> (2) asks is a set is a subset of another, 
> while (3) asks for identity, is that it?

Yes, except that the sets are not mentioned explicitly.
If you wanted to say it in terms of sets, it would be
something like:

(2a) xu lu'i do klesi le'i fanva be abu

(3a) xu lu'i do du le'i fanva be abu

(Assuming {klesi} can mean "x1 is a subset of x2".)

mu'o mi'e xorxes



		
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com