[lojban] Re: possessives

[Philip Newton <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 11:54:42 -0500 (CDT), Adam D. Lopresto
<adam@pubcrawler.org> wrote:
> And I'd much sooner use {be} where appropriate, eg {le speni be do}, {loi kerfa
> be do}.  Slightly longer, but most specific.

Somebody at one point pointed out that he didn't see any use for
{po'e}, since the "obvious" cases (including the ones usually used as
examples - e.g. people's limbs, a book inalienably connected with its
author, etc.), {be} will work in the "obvious" brivla.

Can someone think of a case for {po'e} that can't be replaced by {be}?

mu'o mi'e .filip.
-- 
Philip Newton <philip.newton@gmail.com>