[lojban] Re: na scope. Again.

[Martin Bays <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

* Tuesday, 2004-11-02 at 13:08 -0800 - Jorge Llamb?as <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>:

> 
> --- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> 
> > Does {mi na nelci gi'e djica} mean:
>
> The three meanings can be unambiguously expressed thusly:
> 
> (1) mi ge na nelci gi djica
> (2) mi ge na nelci gi na djica
> (3) mi na ge nelci gi djica
> 
> The parser would suggest that {mi na nelci gi djica} 
> corresponds to (1), but sometimes we don't pay any heed
> to what the parser says in these matters, especially
> when {na} is involved.

{mi naku nelci gi'e djica} would still be (3) though, right?

Martin