[lojban] Re: na scope. Again.

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

--- Martin Bays wrote:
> * Tuesday, 2004-11-02 at 13:08 -0800 - Jorge Llamb?as
> <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>:
> > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > 
> > > Does {mi na nelci gi'e djica} mean:
> >
> > The three meanings can be unambiguously expressed thusly:
> > 
> > (1) mi ge na nelci gi djica
> > (2) mi ge na nelci gi na djica
> > (3) mi na ge nelci gi djica
> > 
> > The parser would suggest that {mi na nelci gi djica} 
> > corresponds to (1), but sometimes we don't pay any heed
> > to what the parser says in these matters, especially
> > when {na} is involved.
> 
> {mi naku nelci gi'e djica} would still be (3) though, right?

Right. And {mi nelci na gi'e djica} is unambiguously (1).

mu'o mi'e xorxes



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com