[lojban] Re: na scope. Again.

[Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>]

--- Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 07:12:16AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > I am doing the section on NA, which should cover some of that. My
> > intention is to propose an interpretation where the scope of {na}
> > is restricted to what follows it. 
> 
> This would change the meaning of simple negations like "mi na klama
> le zarci", would it not?  Good mabla luck.

Not at all, how would that change? There are no quantifiers
or connectives to interact with {na} there.

mu'o mi'e xorxes



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com