[lojban] Re: na scope. Again.

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>]

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 07:12:16AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> I am doing the section on NA, which should cover some of that. My
> intention is to propose an interpretation where the scope of {na}
> is restricted to what follows it. 

This would change the meaning of simple negations like "mi na klama
le zarci", would it not?  Good mabla luck.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/