[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[lojban] usage of to...toi [was: fu'ivla]
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: [lojban] usage of to...toi [was: fu'ivla]
- From: Evgeny Sklyanin <lojban-out@lojban.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:23:15 +0100
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tGuDnyqTc9UIbZrmiScc+f2fSmZbcnvjJX6yfHz5gqCKVQC9Q7oyk4qB5eLVIAovOaN9jaT5Z30DPPfTl4KzEsmyMb3OjhXJ2Xk5Ak+lpLm8hP9SOGriOV0nwkXUPsAKSdgrZ6Dmxh1zt6ts0l9rnQm3+YkBL+V0wywm0luO2KI=
- Reply-to: eks2005@gmail.com
- Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Theodore Reed wrote:
>ganai do djica lo nu do pilno loi rusko lerfu to .e lo drata toi gi do kakne
jbofi'e does not accept the parenthesized phrase {to .e lo drata toi}.
If we delete {.e} then {to lo drata toi} becomes acceptable. It seems
that the parenthesized phrase has to be a grammatically correct
sentence. Is there any way to include the conjunction {.e} as the
author intended?
mi'e .evgenis.