[lojban] Re: Beginning of Esther

[Jorge Llambías <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On 9/26/05, Mark E. Shoulson <mark@kli.org> wrote:
> Pierre Abbat wrote:
>
> >1:4. .i jarco le ka le seltru cu ricfu je carmi .e le ka .abu banli je tsali
> >ze'u lo djedi be li so'i pabino

Is {ze'u} meant to indicate the duration of {banli je tsali}?

> >1:5. .i ca le nu co'u pixsla .abu jajycpe ro zvati be la cucan. prenu noi banli
> >bi'i tolba'i ku'o le purdi be le nolraitru be'o selsruklo tezu'e pixsla ca'o
> >lo djedi be li ze

{.abu} fills the x2 of pixsla here, not the x1 of {jajycpe}.

> >xunro'i joi marmoru joi boijmemai joi xekro'i loldi
> >
>  What's {boijmemai}?  It looks like a fu'ivla,
> but I'm not seeing what it's based on.

It's a cmavo plus a lujvo: {boi jmemai}. Probably
{boljmemai} was meant.


> >1:7. .i punji le selpinxe lo solji kabri .i lo'i vrici kabri cu ficsi'u

That should be {ficysi'u}.

> >1:8. .i flalu le nu pinxe bai noda fu le nolraitru noi minde lei prenu pe le
> >ri zdani lo nu simna lo se djica be ro remna

{nu pinxe kei} or {nunpinxe}.

> {simna}?  Woops.  {sinma}.  It sounds malglico; we don't venerate or
> glorify someone's wishes, we respect them in the sense of obeying them
> or permitting them... I dunno.

{nalpro} maybe? {nalpro ro remna lo se djica}?
There is no gismu for "accept".

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.