[lojban] Re: A ranking system for Lojban speaking proficiency?

[Craig Daniel <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

> > And should spectators be allowed to vote? (Maybe you can let them
> > vote and then somehow weight the results based on what percentage of
> > people voted which way, so you can have win, kinda-win, draw,
> > kinda-loss, loss.)
>
> The underlying math I implemented would be ok with that, but I think
> it would probably produce better results to simply have the results
> of more conversations recoded. (The spectators should go have their
> own conversations. :)

If the spectators are participants in other two-way conversations
within the same multi-way conversation, though, they *are* having
their own conversations.


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.