[lojban] Re: stage 1 and 2 non-fu'ivla

[Jorge Llambías <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On 1/5/06, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> I don't consider stage 1 and stage 2 borrowings to be fu'ivla,
> because to me fu'ivla means "single brivla that is based on a
> borrowing from another language".
>
> How do other people feel about this?

I think cmevla should be a class of brivla. Stage 1 are quoted text,
so they are not even borrowings.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.