[lojban] Re: stage 1 and 2 non-fu'ivla

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 09:31:30AM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> On 1/5/06, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > I don't consider stage 1 and stage 2 borrowings to be fu'ivla,
> > because to me fu'ivla means "single brivla that is based on a
> > borrowing from another language".
> >
> > How do other people feel about this?
> 
> I think cmevla should be a class of brivla. 

Yes, but you're a crazy person.

> Stage 1 are quoted text, so they are not even borrowings.

*nod*

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.