[lojban] Re: A (rather long) discussion of {all}

["Jorge Llambías" <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On 5/21/06, Maxim Katcharov <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com> wrote:
> - perhaps {ckini}
> would be the proper corresponding gismu for {pe}? {srana} seems to
> mean "x1 is about/based on the existence of x2", or "x1 is of interest
> in some way to the understanding of x2".

CLL gives {srana} for it.

That's vague enough, but {ckini} is perhaps excessivley vague, since
anything is related to anything else by some relationship, so it would
be like no restriction at all. On the other hand, the mere presence of the
sumti must pragmatically respond to some relevance, so I suppose
{ckini} should work too.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.