[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: A (rather long) discussion of {all}

On 5/21/06, Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:

On 5/21/06, Maxim Katcharov <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> - perhaps {ckini}
> would be the proper corresponding gismu for {pe}? {srana} seems to
> mean "x1 is about/based on the existence of x2", or "x1 is of interest
> in some way to the understanding of x2".

CLL gives {srana} for it.


I don't think {srana} is correct. If it is correct, then what do you
define srana as? And what's the difference between srana and ckini?



That's vague enough, but {ckini} is perhaps excessivley vague, since
anything is related to anything else by some relationship, so it would


Yes, I agree, though perhaps if it was defined as "related to x2 in
some coherent way"?


be like no restriction at all. On the other hand, the mere presence of the
sumti must pragmatically respond to some relevance, so I suppose
{ckini} should work too.



To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.