[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: Alphabet proposal one.



On 7/11/06, Matt Arnold <matt.mattarn@gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/10/06, Maxim Katcharov <maxim.katcharov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/10/06, robin <robin@bilkent.edu.tr> wrote:
>
> Yet each
> of you want to I suppose 'diversify' the language by not specifying an
> official alphabet? I'm confused, and think that I may have missed
> something here.
>
This has already been done. Since the beginning of the language, even
though the Latin alphabet was the official standard, it was
permissable to transcribe into Arabic, Cyrillic, Hebrew, and Greek
character sets. They even created words for it. The words {ru'o}
{ge'o} {je'o} and {lo'a} are a set of verbal "shift keys". They mean
to dictate to a computer or amanuensis that they should shift
letterals to Arabic, Cyrillic, Greek, Hebrew, and Lojban (Latin)
character sets respectively.

-epkat


Sigh/resignation. At least they're standardized and limited, which
means that all we really need is a simple replacement program. I'm
glad for that, but I would have preferred unity, even if it is under
the Latin flag. Is there a page that lists the letterals?


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.