[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
From: Timothy Hobbs <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:21:09 -0700
In-reply-to: <45176439.3ea103d8.0188.ffffa33d@mx.gmail.com> (M.'s message of "Sun\, 24 Sep 2006 23\:09\:00 -0600")
References: <45176439.3ea103d8.0188.ffffa33d@mx.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tim.thelion@gmail.com
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

The defanition of a language is a set of paterns that represent a description.  

I say "go take out the trash." I am describing that I want you to take the trash out...
If I say.  i=0 I am describing i as being equal to 0 
ect.

no?


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
  - From: "M@" <lojban-out@lojban.org>

References:
- [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
  - From: "M@" <lojban-out@lojban.org>

Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
Next by Date: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.2
Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
Next by thread: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread