[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.2

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.2
From: Timothy Hobbs <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 22:50:30 -0700
In-reply-to: <45176966.22d930c9.30be.ffff9907@mx.gmail.com> (M.'s message of "Sun\, 24 Sep 2006 23\:31\:13 -0600")
References: <45176966.22d930c9.30be.ffff9907@mx.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tim.thelion@gmail.com
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

imagin a pim, wich you interacted with in lojban.

what does lojban have to do with IL?



To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.

Follow-Ups:
- [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.2
  - From: "M@" <lojban-out@lojban.org>

References:
- [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.2
  - From: "M@" <lojban-out@lojban.org>

Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.2
Next by Date: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.2
Next by thread: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread