[lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1

• To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
• Subject: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
• From: "M@" <lojban-out@lojban.org>
• Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:38:40 -0600
• In-reply-to: <20060925175651.81328.qmail@web81311.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
• References: <200609251220.32525.phma@phma.optus.nu> <20060925175651.81328.qmail@web81311.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
• Reply-to: matthew.dunlap@gmail.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • [lojban] Re: Portuguese was: my opinion on why lojban
    • From: Pierre Abbat <lojban-out@lojban.org>

• References:
  • [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
    • From: Pierre Abbat <lojban-out@lojban.org>
  • [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
    • From: John E Clifford <lojban-out@lojban.org>

• Prev by Date: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
• Next by Date: [lojban] Re: Portuguese was: my opinion on why lojban
• Previous by thread: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.1
• Next by thread: [lojban] Re: Portuguese was: my opinion on why lojban
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread