[lojban] Re: Military language

["Jorge Llambías" <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On 1/3/07, Seth Gordon <sethg@ropine.com> wrote:
> M@ wrote:
>
> > Of course, there can still be misunderstandings, if there is
> > interference and the word 'na' doesn't come through out of "ko na daspo
> > le ckule" bad things would probably happen.
>
> Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military
> telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word?

Hmm...

I wonder whether the two {na}'s in {ko na ke'u na daspo le ckule}
would cancel out? What would a robot bomber do?

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.