[lojban] Re: Military language

[Seth Gordon <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

Jorge Llambías wrote:
>> Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military
>> telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word?
> 
> 
> Hmm...
> 
> I wonder whether the two {na}'s in {ko na ke'u na daspo le ckule}
> would cancel out? What would a robot bomber do?

I had assumed that there was a more long-winded way of saying "na", but
I don't see it from skimming the gismu list.  Maybe one should tell the
bomber {ko sisti lenu pu'o daspo le ckule}?

> 
> mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.