[lojban] Re: Lojban-English full dictionary effort- request for assistance

["Jorge Llambías" <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On 1/2/08, Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
>  If you coin a lujvo without
> determining its place structure, you miss out on the possibility that
> sel[xxxxxx] might be the best lujvo for an English concept.

I suspect such lujvo will be very rare, because the tendency seems
to be to interpret them as [selxxx]xxx. In jbovlaste I found only one
each of types selkem[xxxxxx], terkem[xxxxxx], velkem[xxxxxx], and
none with xelkem-. I couldn't find any without -kem- and meant to be
interpreted as sel[xxxxxx], but there might be some and I might have
missed them. Is anyone aware of any such lujvo?

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.