Jorge Llambías wrote:
On 1/2/08, Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:If you coin a lujvo without determining its place structure, you miss out on the possibility that sel[xxxxxx] might be the best lujvo for an English concept.I suspect such lujvo will be very rare, because the tendency seems to be to interpret them as [selxxx]xxx. In jbovlaste I found only one each of types selkem[xxxxxx], terkem[xxxxxx], velkem[xxxxxx], and none with xelkem-. I couldn't find any without -kem- and meant to be interpreted as sel[xxxxxx], but there might be some and I might have missed them. Is anyone aware of any such lujvo?
I suspect that there aren't many yet because there aren't all that many lujvo with agreed upon places. (I don't actually know what the count is for lujvo in jbovlaste that a) are not themselves based on SE b) have place structures which have seen any usage of non-x1 places. Of course, I am not even sure how many 2 part and 3 part lujvo there are in jbovlaste with defined places structures at all.)
lojbab To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.