[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] de-, un- ce zo'e (was: common words)



In a message dated 12/3/2000 3:37:49 PM Central Standard Time,
jjllambias@hotmail.com writes:



>None of the obvious seem quite right:
>{tol} has been examined already,

And summarily dismissed? I want a re-count!



Well, when I thought about it later, it seemed to me that "x is the cleartext
from cryptext y under encryption z" is the polar opposite of "x is the
cryptext from cleartext y under encryption z" within the scale of texts
involved in encryption z, and so {tol} may just be right here.  I had only
meant that something had been said about it already and I had nothing to add,
not that it was dismissed, however.

But, come to that, what about selmifygau?