[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TECH: Lujvo Paper (Part 3)
- To: lojbab@grebyn.com (Logical Language Group)
- Subject: Re: TECH: Lujvo Paper (Part 3)
- From: nsn (Nick Nicholas)
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1993 17:54:37 +1000 (EST)
- Cc: nsn (Nick Nicholas)
>If any experimental cmavo are mentioned in formal papers describing the
>language as being the "way to do something" then they are no longer
>experimental but rather part of our pedagogical teaching.
Mm. Well, it still doesn't look to me to be useful for anything *but*
paedagogy, so I'd keep it experimental if I were me... *shrug* I found them
to be helpful in the explication (though I'm not sure I picked the best
lujvo examples to explain what I was getting at); what you do with xo'e
is up to LLG.
The Greek folk tales are both revisions: didn't I title it TEXT.REV?
I'm probably going to be too busy to move on the the next part of the lujvo
paper or Cafe work soon, but you'll be kept posted.
Momenton senpretende paseman mi retenis kaj # [Victor Sadler, _Memkritiko_ 90]
kultis kvazaux & (NICK NICHOLAS. Melbourne.
senhorlogxan elizeon # Australia. IRC: nicxjo.
(Dume: & nsn@munagin.ee.mu.oz.au .)