any, opaque, transparent, xe'e...

[Goran Topic <topic@MATH.HR>]

la xorxes. cusku di'e:

> The normal way to say "I eat the apple" is {mi citka le pa plise}.
> You can say {mi citka lo pa plise}, but then you really mean that only
> one apple exists.

Just a moment, and let me check if my understanding is correct...
Doesn't it say that onlspacetime interval? Like, {mi citka lo pa plise be vi le
 vi jumbe pagbu}?

And one other thing... About the opaque/transparent thing... I have been
listening to the discussion for about a month (or more?), and I basically
know what is wrong with "any", but I can't figure out what in fact do
"opaque" andate, but my mind
usually just skips over these words, not being able to parse them.
And, some definition of {xe'e} a bit more clear than

> Not my {xe'e}. The way I'd define it is something like: "Potentially everyone
> but only one and no other, and none fits the predication in actuality".

I think I got that it means one and just one arbitrarily chosen from whole
set (if used with default {lo} quantifiers), but I can't fathom the meaning
of "none fits the predication in actuality".

Thanks, and

co'o mi'e. goran.

--
Learn languages! The more langs you know, the more incomprehensible you can get
e'udoCILreleiBANgu.izo'ozo'onairoBANguteDJUnobedocubanRI'a.ailekadonaka'eSELjmi