Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, (continued)
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Goran Topic
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Jorge Llambias
  • Re: preti zo goi .e zo nai, Jorge Llambias
• any, opaque, transparent, xe'e..., Goran Topic
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: any, opaque, transparent, xe'e..., jorge
  • Re: any, opaque, transparent, xe'e..., Chris Bogart
  • Re: any, opaque, transparent, xe'e..., jorge
  • Re: any, opaque, transparent, xe'e..., Chris Bogart
  • Re: any, opaque, transparent, xe'e..., Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: any, opaque, transparent, xe'e..., Chris Bogart
  • Re: any, opaque, transparent, xe'e..., RRICCI
• any & every & naku, Gerald Koenig
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: any & every & naku, jorge
• some definitions, John E. Clifford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: some definitions, jorge
  • some definitions, John E. Clifford
  • Re: some definitions, Mark E. Shoulson
  • Re: some definitions, jorge
  • Re: some definitions, i . alexander . bra0125
  • Re: some definitions, i . alexander . bra0125
• Re: The "problem" with external quantifiers, Veijo Vilva
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The "problem" with external quantifiers, Randall Holmes
  • Re: The "problem" with external quantifiers, Randall Holmes
  • Re: The "problem" with external quantifiers, John E. Clifford
• support, Gerald Koenig
• context in Lojban, bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, Chris Bogart
  • Re: context in Lojban, Chris Bogart
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: context in Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: context in Lojban, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
    • Re: context in Lojban, Logical Language Group
    • Re: context in Lojban, Logical Language Group
  • Re: context in Lojban, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, ucleaar
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, jorge
  • Re: context in Lojban, Chris Bogart
  • Re: context in Lojban, Chris Bogart
• Re: singular and plural, bob
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: singular and plural, jorge
  • Re: singular and plural, jorge
  • Re: singular and plural, jorge
  • Re: singular and plural, jorge
• "any" FAQ needed?, Chris Bogart
• "any" and misc, Logical Language Group
• more on "any", Logical Language Group
• your posting and Holmes' reply, Logical Language Group
  • Re: your posting and Holmes' reply, veion
• Re: veridicality, Robert J. Chassell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: veridicality, Robert J. Chassell
  • Re: veridicality, ucleaar
  • Re: veridicality, jorge
  • Re: veridicality, ucleaar
  • Re: veridicality, jorge
  • veridicality, John E. Clifford
  • veridicality, John E. Clifford
  • Re: veridicality, ucleaar
  • Re: veridicality, ucleaar
• Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, Logical Language Group
  • Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, ucleaar
  • Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, jorge
  • Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, ucleaar
  • Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, jorge
    • Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, Logical Language Group
    • Re: Cowan weighs in #1: specific, definite, Logical Language Group
• Cowan weighs in #2: needing a box, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Cowan weighs in #2: needing a box, Logical Language Group
• Cowan weighs in #3: John and James love Steve or Mary, Logical Language Group
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Cowan weighs in #3: John and James love Steve or Mary, Logical Language Group