Re: lo sidbo cu na fuzme...

[Lionel Bonnetier <leo@EASYNET.FR>]

I wrote:

> >I have a correction and a question on what I wrote:
> >> i uu lo prenu cu na fuzme le se cinmo poi catke ra le sidbo
> >
> >The correction: I should have used "noi" rather than "poi", since the
> >relative bridi comes as an additional information, not as a way of picking
> >up some "cinmo" among the whole of them.

Jorge replied:

> Could you explain what you mean by the relative clause?  I suppose
> {ra} stands for the person, then: "It is not the case that some person
> is responsible for the emotion, which pushes the person on the idea"?
> I think you must mean something different, do you mean the emotions
> that the idea generates on the person?

Your first guess was right. I wanted to stress that while "No idea is
responsible for its believer", it is still hard to set the responsability on
the believer, since ideas are kind of crystalized behaviors, and I think
behavior is emotion-driven. Thus: "No one is responsible for his emotions,
the very ones that drive him to his ideas (however foolish they can be)."

Maybe: uu ro prenu na fuzme lo nu cinmo noi catke ra lo sidbo

Thank you.

Lionel

   Lionel Bonnetier <leo@easynet.fr>   Ph: +33 478 601 862