[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Poesy (WAS Re: Online learning)
- To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: Poesy (WAS Re: Online learning)
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 12:25:53 -0400
- Reply-to: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
>It's always a problem finding a comprise between metricality
>and grammaticality. Apart from the last line, it should all fit rou=
>ghly
>into tetrameter or trimeter (second verse), but sometimes you have to "sc=
>runch"
>some of the cmavo. Fine in English, but I'm not sure if Lojban is
>supposed to be syllable-timed or stress-timed. If the atter is the
>case, this obviously wouldn't work.
There has been no ruling made on stress vs. syllable timing. I am sure that
most English native speakers pronounce Lojban stress-timed to match their
native speech pattern. I would like to hear how Lojban sounds spoken with a
proper syllble timing - but am not sure which I would favor. Syllable-timing
has an atraction of "exoticness", but I am not sure that is a trait we should
value or shun in promoting Lojban. Besides, to much ot he world, there is
nothing exotic about syllable timing. But I can't pretned to know enough to
make a dispassionate judegment.
lojbab