[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "Ash"




mi pu cusku di'e

> If we bear in mind that Lojban does not such have a strict distinction
> between parts of speech as many natlangs, there doesn't seem to be a
> problem here.  "mrobi'o" does not seem particularly unwieldy.
>
> As for "ash", could one construct a lujvo from "morsi se fagri" (a bit
> metaphorical) or "se xaksu se fagri" perhaps?  Beyond my meagre lujzba
> skills, I'm afraid!

This shows the value of looking at the Refgram - at the beginning of
Chapter 12, the first example of a lujvo is
"fagyfesti"="fire-waste"="ashes"!

co'o mi'e robin.