[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lo lunra selgusni ninmu
- Subject: Re: lo lunra selgusni ninmu
- From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 08:40:54 -0500
At 11:05 AM 2/27/99 -0300, Jorge J. Llambías wrote:
>>From: SwiftRain <swiftrain@geocities.com>
>>i see. but what does it mean to say that a single event is both puzu
>>and bazu? does that mean that it stretches from far past to far future
>>-- does "puzuku bazuku broda" assert that "caku broda"?
>
>I would say at least it strongly suggests it, yes.
I disagree per my post
> I can't see how one
>single event could be both in the past and in the future without it being
>in the present.
One can look at two apparently separate events as being a single continuous
event with an interruption. For example if a multiday race is stopped for
the night (I think that's the way Grand prix races work), then at night you
can talk about pujoiba litru as a simultaneously past and future event.
You can also use such a tense in a looping concept of time where the future
indeed is the past, or in a time travel scenario, or... Use your
imagination %^)
lojbab