[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lojban Adventure - volunteer wanted
- Subject: Re: Lojban Adventure - volunteer wanted
- From: "Jorge J. Llambías" <jorge@intermedia.com.ar>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 20:46:35 -0300
la robin cusku di'e
>la deltab cusku di'e
>
>> .i.o'a le nu mi cusku bau la lojban. xlali
>
>Me too! But I think it should be {xlali lojban.} "bad-type-of Lojban", not
>{lojban. xlali} "lojbanic badness". Not sure where the article should go'
>though.
Actually, his sentence is grammatically correct. {xlali} is the selbri
of the main clause: le nu mi cusku bau la lojban kei cu xlali
Both {kei} and {cu} are elidable there.
{xlali lojban} is not grammatical, you can't modify a name with a brivla.
I'm not sure I understand {o'a} there. I don't think his Lojban is bad,
but if he he does, why feel proud about it? Maybe {o'anai} was meant?
co'o mi'e xorxes