Re: [lojban] RE:literalism

["michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>]

> From: "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" <lojbab@lojban.org>
     li'o
> a lujvo is not "real Lojban"
> until it is given such a place structure.  (Hence my stress in asking
> people working on the lujvo file is to get keywords and places structures
> out there for them,

my fast & loose rule in coining lujvo is that the x2 of the lujvo is the 
same as x2 of the final rafsi; & very seldom have i had more than that sumti 
filled. i think this will be a common assumption in
spoken lojban. and perhaps when there are going to be more than
x1 & x2, clarity suggests turning it back into a tanru for the
sake of not interrupting discourse so everyone can sit down with
pencil & paper (or a dictionary, should that be available)...
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.