Two more type IV fu'ivla questions

[Richard Curnow <richard@rrbcurnow.freeuk.com>]

1. In the online version of the Ref. Grammar there is a statement

  It is possible to have fu'ivla like ``spa'i'' that are five letters
  long,

yet doesn't spa'i fail the slinku'i test, because (for example) baspa'i
would be a valid lujvo (I leave the meaning to the reader's imagination
:-) )  So is the first statement wrong?

2. Does Lojban make any use at all of CCV as a word on its own (e.g.
   spa)?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Curnow                                       rpc@myself.com
Weston-super-Mare
United Kingdom                            http://go.to/richard.curnow/