[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi

To: lojban@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 16:50:02 -0500
In-reply-to: <00121211423801.09168@neofelis>; from phma@oltronics.net on Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:32:00AM -0500
References: <Pine.BSI.3.95.1001211082539.16632B-100000@locke.ccil.org> <00121211423801.09168@neofelis>
Reply-to: rob@twcny.rr.com
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 11:32:00AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> CVC/CVCV: yes

Is that really possible? That breaks apart into a gismu form (CVC/CV) and a
cmavo form (CV). Is that allowable provided that the CVC/CV part isn't a gismu?

--
la rabspir.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
- Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
  - From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>

References:
- Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
  - From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] fu'ivla tarmi
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread