[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] su'u

To: Jorge Llambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] su'u
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 19:23:08 -0500
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <F2791kJMUMQJtm0sFAP00003f17@hotmail.com>; from jjllambias@hotmail.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:01:13AM +0000
Mail-followup-to: Jorge Llambias <jjllambias@hotmail.com>, lojban@yahoogroups.com
References: <F2791kJMUMQJtm0sFAP00003f17@hotmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:01:13AM +0000, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> la xod cusku di'e
> 
> >No. However, I do not think a single sumti in an abstraction is
> >meaningless or ambiguous.
> 
> I don't know about meaningless, but it would be ambiguous.
> {le nu mi klama} could mean {(le nu mi) klama} and
> {le nu (mi klama}.

As a fragment, maybe, but mi catlu le nu do klama is quite clear.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ 	BTW, I'm male, honest.
Information wants to be free.  Too bad most of it is crap.  --RLP

References:
- Re: [lojban] su'u
  - From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] su'u
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] su'u
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] su'u
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] su'u
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread