> I don't know about meaningless, but it would be ambiguous.
> {le nu mi klama} could mean {(le nu mi) klama} and
> {le nu (mi klama}.
As a fragment, maybe, but mi catlu le nu do klama is quite clear.
-Robin
But no matter how many clear cases there are, as long as there is one ambiguous case we have ambiguity. do catlu be le nu mi klama could parse as: do (catlu be le nu mi) klama or as: do catlu be le nu (mi klama) co'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.