[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] nilbroda
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [lojban] nilbroda
- From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:37:17 -0500
- In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010222185345.00b9a4e0@127.0.0.1>
- References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010221150126.00b6d280@127.0.0.1> <4.3.2.7.2.20010216215932.00af0130@127.0.0.1> <4.3.2.7.2.20010222185345.00b9a4e0@127.0.0.1>
- Reply-to: phma@oltronics.net
- Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com
It's still not clear to me. For a non-variadic nilbroda, what is the
convention? Should I go by the reference grammar, which puts ni2 at the end, or
the dictionary, which puts it second?
phma