Re: [lojban] Back to the GNOME stuff

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Björn Gohla wrote:


> i came across this kind of problem working on the level0 package.
> taking into account the ISO 639 standard the an appropriate lang code for 
> lojban would be "x-loj".
> the "x-" is for unofficial codes, and the considering the that the standard 
> also allows three letter codes "loj" is preferreable for verbosity.


I'm going to request IETF registration for "i-lojban".  I'm on the
mailing list, the reviewer is a buddy of mine, he's a conlanger,
and i-klingon is already registered.  Should take 2 weeks.

So please go ahead and use i-lojban: nobody else will want it!

--
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein