Re: [lojban] Back to the GNOME stuff

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Please ignore my earlier message!

Björn Gohla wrote:


> i came across this kind of problem working on the level0 package.
> taking into account the ISO 639 standard the an appropriate lang code for 
> lojban would be "x-loj".
> the "x-" is for unofficial codes, and the considering the that the standard 
> also allows three letter codes "loj" is preferreable for verbosity.


I am requesting IETF registration of the code "art-lojban" ("art" is
the ISO 639-2 code for artificial languages generally).  This should
take about two weeks, as I expect it to sail through.

--
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein