Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) wrote:
> At 04:45 AM 07/15/2001 +0100, And Rosta wrote:
>
>>No -- what you say is in clear contradiction to the Woldy Codex, page 136
>>in discussion of ex. 11.5, though I too was in error. It is clear from
>>the book that "coi nanmu" = "coi le nanmu" = "coi do voi nanmu fa ke'a".
>
> Well, I could say the book is wrong, but that wouldn't be appropriate. %^)
>
> I'll just say that in ex. 11.5 there doesn't seem to be a substantial
> difference in meaning between his chosen expansion and mine, which would
> have use "la" instead of "le".
Sure there is. I distinctly remember asking you whether "doi girl in
the red dress" (Carter vocative) was intended to be veridical or non-v.,
and you distinctly said non-v. There was no question of its meaning
"O person named Girl In Red Dress!" which indeed is doi la etc.