[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] questions about DOI & cmene
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [lojban] questions about DOI & cmene
- From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 20:58:00 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: jimc@math.ucla.edu
- In-reply-to: <4.3.2.7.2.20010716193100.00c23b20@127.0.0.1> from "Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" at "Jul 16, 2001 07:36:51 pm"
Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) scripsit:
> Umm, asking me veridical or non-v. doesn't to me differentiate between la
> and le, since both are non-v. in that neither la xunre nor le xunre have to
> actually be red. It differentiates between la/le and lo.
True.
> Saying that there was no question of its meaning something doesn't tell me
> whether it means it or doesn't mean it (I can read it either way), so which
> are you concluding?
I conclude that "doi cribe" = "doi la cribe" was never considered,
because that is not what Carter vocatives are for: they are all about
identifying "do" based on some characteristic such as "girl in the red
dress". The question was whether that description had to be veridical;
you said it didn't.
I have copied jimc.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
--Douglas Hofstadter